• Ownership
• Strategic planning
  
• Tactical planning
  
• Operational planning

• Board / Shareholders
  
• Chief Executive Officer
  
• Chief Financial Officer
  
• Chief Operating Officer
• Chief Information Officer
• Chief Enterprise Architect
• Chief Financial Auditor / Architect
  
• Chief Business Analyst / Architect
  
• Chief Information Architect
• Solution Architect
• Data Architect
• Systems Architect
  

Most people recognise that capitalism must be improved upon. Democracy is supposed to give the poor the ability to counteract the rich but due to the unchecked growth of large corporations it has happened that communally, corporations are more powerful than their governments making the people’s votes effectively useless.

The problem with capitalism is well defined.  The solution is not, here is my take on one.

The solution:

1. Disconnect Democracy and Capitalism:

Remove capitalism from the government, ban any kind of legal "bribery".  Completely disconnect government employees from free enterprise.  Government must answer to the voters and only the voters.  Any possibility of interference by the rich must be strongly countered.

2. Capitalism must pay for its right to exist:

At the financial year end of each company, after dividends are paid, the registrar of companies unilaterally issues 1%-10% of additional shares for that company and assign ownership of these shares as follows:

• For publicly traded companies the shares are assigned to the national revenue service.  The law will enact that these shares are automatically sold at market rates 1 month before the next financial year end or earlier.
• For private companies the shares are assigned to the unemployment fund.  These shares may be retained as investment for the fund or sold at the best rate obtainable.

Why it works:

1. The first and most difficult problem to solve is the one where capitalists have gained power over the government due to it's ability to influence the choices of government officials, effectively bypassing democracy.  It doesn't matter who is elected, their greed can be used to manipulate them.  This solution involves creating one simple law, which will impact a legion of other laws.

2. The capitalist's power is in his capital, these resources provide leverage for the capitalist to generate more capital and control over people.  It is very difficult to tax resource like land, intellectual property and processes.  However capitalism has devised an ingenious method of measuring the aggregate value of an organisation's capital, namely it's stock price.  By taxing the ownership of an organisation, one uses the capitalist system to empower the government who's sole responsibility is to empower the people.

References:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_democracy

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_democracy

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_socialism

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism

With bourgeoisification in this context I intend to name that quality of human nature which drives many people to “keep up with the joneses”. 

That need for comparative self-actualization, which drives people to see themselves as and strive to be better than their neighbor.

I’m specifically staying away from the religious aspects of this, as religion will have many answers to why humans have this need.  Suffice it to say that human somehow do have this strife for whatever reason.

I tender that this is the flaw in humanity which has been the largest stumbling block in attempts to accomplish peace and equality on earth. 

"But almost always, during the initial stage of the struggle, the oppressed, instead of striving for liberation, tend themselves to become oppressors...

It is not to become free that they want agrarian reform, but in order to acquire land and thus become landowners-or; more precisely, bosses over other workers. It is a rare peasant who, once "promoted" to overseer, does not become more of a tyrant towards his former comrades than the owner himself." Communist University

One practical model exemplifying the nature of mental intelligence as an organising and synthesising function is found in the thought of political/military 'intelligence' where organisations have been built up in stages to cope with at least three major levels necessary to arriving at the overall judgements of 'intelligence'. The stages are 1) signals, 2) deciphering, 3) intelligence. The building up of an intelligence network, such as the enormous one developed by the Allies during World War II, involves (1) the registering of a very large volume of radio and other 'signals traffic' (the observations that form the main basis), (2) a painstaking process of decoding (i.e. understanding and relating the content of the recorded signals) as a preliminary to (3) the cross-analysis of their mass for general features and their relation to other relevant sources of knowledge. Even then it remains to draw conclusions from all this information about future action: about the intentions they reveal (on the part of 'the enemy') and to formulate strategies to counteract them where necessary.

For the individual psyche the three stages correspond to (1) perception, (2) interpretation and (3) understanding. Depending upon the very different requirements of the whole environment in which any person lives, the mass of materials or 'data traffic' that must be handled at the basic level and the complexities that 'deciphering' them calls for, some minds remain 'undeveloped' in that they cannot master sufficient organisation at the first or second stages, while even a majority of educated persons may remain incapable of syntheses of a very comprehensive nature at a high level of generality.

 http://robertpriddy.com/P/12intellig.html